Asrock B85 Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	34.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock B85 Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 17 '17 at 02:56
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	51%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$51 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	68.8% Good	Memory 88.6 1-Core 95.4 2-Core 185 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 243 37% 268 Pts	64-Core 281 17% 281 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3201) 2GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.43 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	34.9% Below average	Lighting 45.4 Reflection 42.6 Parallax 38.2 37% 42.1 fps	MRender 39 Gravity 39.8 Splatting 34.7 31% 37.9 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB 3,936 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 220GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 852 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 135 (B1) Unknown 99 99 1 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 52 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 119 (EB) Unknown 99 99 26 (F1) Unknown 99 99 2217778711	109% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 391 Mixed 407 96% 433 MB/s	4K Read 43.5 4K Write 87.9 4K Mixed 46.6 172% 59.3 MB/s	DQ Read 342 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 85.1 111% 204 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 128%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 963GB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 144 144 82 (03) Spinup time 134 134 30091510168 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 33062 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 33 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 11063 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 33062 (C0) Power-off retract count 73 73 33063 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 73 73 33063 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 244813987870 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	73.6% Very good	Read 127 Write 130 Mixed 136 99% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.18 68% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 88%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB 28,278 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 104GB free Firmware: 03.00C12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 1141 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1554 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 59 59 30254 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1514 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 406 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1147 (C2) HDA temperature 118 100 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 29 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	54.6% Above average	Read 106 Write 84 Mixed 72.4 65% 87.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.31 93% 0.99 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-014.A00LF 9905471-021.A00LF 9905471-014.A00LF 9905471-021.A00LF 16GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.4% Average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 14.5 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.7 28% 9.63 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85 Pro4 Builds (Compare 637 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock B85 Pro4 - $90

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	122x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	62x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	66x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	54x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	48x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	20x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	18x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	18x
Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCrucialBench 56%, 44,086 samples	16x
BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GBCrucialBench 57%, 14,299 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $512

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16