Wortmann TERRA Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemWortmann TERRA Server  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel S5000VSA
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20081013
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 18:56
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5430
CPU1, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
36.6% Below average
Memory 45.8
1-Core 41.8
2-Core 84.4
34% 57.3 Pts
4-Core 148
8-Core 226
23% 187 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SP2014N 200GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC100-41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 22 23 22 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 21.4
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 22.7
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB FB-DIMM DDR2 FB-DIMM
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 4.8
MC Write 2.2
MC Mixed 4
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 2.2
6% 1.97 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 76%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 8 64 0" 1280 720
Typical TERRA Server Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann TERRA Server

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback