Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 173%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 18:04
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 294
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 587
8-Core 1,167
104% 877 Pts
64-Core 2,330
144% 2,330 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-$759
XFX(1EAE 6705) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 195
Parallax 414
151% 265 fps
MRender 349
Gravity 148
Splatting 229
195% 242 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 153%
Great: 153%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$46
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1313 409 408 410 410 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 2,618
Write 2,268
Mixed 1,582
SusWrite 560
391% 1,757 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 185
4K Mixed 95.3
325% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,011
DQ Write 1,172
DQ Mixed 1,165
858% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 288%
Great: 302%
Pcie SSD 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: EGFM15.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2439 2474 2473 2474 2474 2480 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
373% Outstanding
Read 1760
Write 2,409
Mixed 2,067
SusWrite 2,469
494% 2,176 MB/s
4K Read 50.5
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 82.7
276% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,566
DQ Write 1,405
DQ Mixed 1,455
1,099% 1,475 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 373%
Great: 556%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 207 206 209 205 209 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 153
Mixed 69.2
SusWrite 206
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
101% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 207 197 173 164 191 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
97.1% Outstanding
Read 150
Write 168
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 189
107% 147 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 106%
Seagate SkyHawk 2TB (2016)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: CV12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 173 175 174 172 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 172
Mixed 79.8
SusWrite 173
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4400 C19 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
141% Outstanding
MC Read 55.4
MC Write 53
MC Mixed 53.5
154% 54 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 44.5
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 141%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 43.4" 1280 720 ACI28A3 ASUS PB287Q
Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $772
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback