TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive459% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín, 1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221121
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 15:42
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$196
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 76.8
1-Core 206
2-Core 412
119% 232 Pts
4-Core 745
8-Core 1096
115% 920 Pts
64-Core 1,376
85% 1,376 Pts
Poor: 101% ↑
This bench: 108%
 Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
MSI(1462 3976)
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.88
Relative performance n/a - GPU benchmark error
Poor: 90% Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
854GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2867 3098 2941 2507 1687 1555 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
459% Outstanding
Read 3,019
Write 3,320
Mixed 2,784
SusWrite 2,442
652% 2,891 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 107
371% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 1,820
DQ Write 1,514
DQ Mixed 1675
1,252% 1,670 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑
This bench: 459%
 Great: 488%
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 229 233 230 232 232 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Read 230
Write 218
Mixed 134
SusWrite 232
46% 203 MB/s
4K Read 60.8
4K Write 14.5
4K Mixed 1.2
101% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1.4
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 0.7
2% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 50.5%
 Great: 46%
Asmt USB 3.0 Destop H 750GB
555GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 31 30 31 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 157
Write 30.4
Mixed 35.4
SusWrite 30.5
46% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑
This bench: 53.7%
 Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF552C36-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
147% Outstanding
MC Read 51.1
MC Write 54.2
MC Mixed 52.4
150% 52.6 GB/s
SC Read 47.8
SC Write 57.8
SC Mixed 51.4
150% 52.3 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 134% ↑
This bench: 147%
 Great: 181%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 23.8" 1280 720 BNQ802C BenQ BL2480
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS Builds (Compare 178 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 196%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 199%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS

CPU
Ryzen 7 7800X3DAMD  $310Bench 117%, 4,385 samples61x
Ryzen 5 7600XAMD  $196Bench 110%, 6,311 samples44x
Ryzen 7 7700XAMD  $234Bench 112%, 4,548 samples42x
GPU
RX 6800-XTAMD  $650Bench 171%, 20,197 samples16x
RTX 4070Nvidia  $550Bench 190%, 45,585 samples16x
RTX 3070Nvidia  $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples10x
SSD
SNV2S2000G 2TBKingstonBench 280%, 16,715 samples12x
CT1000P3PSSD8 1TBBench 286%, 17,197 samples12x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples8x
RAM
KF560C36-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 178%, 10,381 samples25x
Vengeance LPX 2x16GBCorsairBench 172%, 3,239 samples11x
Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GBCorsairBench 162%, 23,486 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $960
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback