Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics11.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive19% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-DG3+  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 01 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-6400B APU
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 23.1
2-Core 29.9
26% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 42
8-Core 49.2
6% 45.6 Pts
64-Core 51.8
3% 51.8 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B E174) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Lighting 15.6
Reflection 19
Parallax 11.8
13% 15.5 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 10.1
9% 11.2 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 128GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0104A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 23 15 38 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19% Very poor
Read 116
Write 78.2
Mixed 120
SusWrite 32.3
19% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 11.2
4K Mixed 7.7
28% 8.97 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 63.8
DQ Mixed 1.8
24% 58.1 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 19%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT25664BD160BJ.C4F Kingston 9905403-478.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.4% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 6.3
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 38: 0P 3R 5G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 18% 88 152 28 60 21.6" 1920 1080 BNQ785A BenQG2222HDL
Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback