TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 155%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 149%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (87th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 13 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive336% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 12 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 11 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star MS-7A35
MotherboardMSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230518
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 23:12
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$328
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 99.6
1-Core 164
2-Core 329
108% 197 Pts
4-Core 657
8-Core 1241
113% 949 Pts
64-Core 1,284
80% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑
This bench: 111%
 Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
PowerColor(148C 2409) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 149
Parallax 338
131% 216 fps
MRender 279
Gravity 168
Splatting 226
182% 224 fps
Poor: 113% ↑
This bench: 139%
 Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$58
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1910 1561 698 687 675 703 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
336% Outstanding
Read 2,850
Write 2,605
Mixed 2,102
SusWrite 1,039
481% 2,149 MB/s
4K Read 65.8
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 88
290% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1447
DQ Write 1,617
DQ Mixed 1,689
1,228% 1,584 MB/s
Poor: 162% ↑
This bench: 336%
 Great: 463%
Nvme CT500P 500GB
154GB free
Firmware: P9CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 13,112
Write 11,534
Mixed 12,411
2,757% 12,353 MB/s
4K Read 614
4K Write 551
4K Mixed 572
1,954% 579 MB/s
DQ Read 2,188
DQ Write 1,968
DQ Mixed 2,052
1,546% 2,069 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 332%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GB-$193
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
229% Outstanding
MC Read 187
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 54.8
257% 89.9 GB/s
SC Read 37.6
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 50.6
111% 38.8 GB/s
Latency 37.9
106% 37.9 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 229%
 Great: 142%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7089 LC32G5xT
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35) Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X370 GAMING M7 ACK (MS-7A35)

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD  $235Bench 72%, 30,050 samples12x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples9x
Ryzen 5 1600XAMD  $125Bench 74%, 140,440 samples6x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples11x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples5x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples3x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples4x
MX500 1TBCrucial  $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples3x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples3x
RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 4x8GBG.SKILL  $193Bench 106%, 7,103 samples4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples3x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL  $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $723
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback