Acer Nitro AN515-53

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
13 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-53  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Freed_CFS
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 20:13
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 189
67% 120 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 353
41% 321 Pts
64-Core 377
23% 377 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1264) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 6
5% 13.1 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GJ 128GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 66 28 38 28 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 60.7
Write 332
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 47.8
27% 117 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 22.6
77% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 75.3
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 174
115% 133 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 78%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
504GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 115 114 115 110 117 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 117
Write 139
Mixed 39
SusWrite 114
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4SFD826A.C16FBR 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.5% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 11.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 0P 2R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 25% 40 434 313 60 15.5" 1536 864 AUO61ED
Typical Nitro AN515-53 Builds (Compare 2,757 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $49
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback