Dell Precision T3610

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T3610
MotherboardDell Precision T3610  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 15:29
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 365
8-Core 552
57% 459 Pts
64-Core 687
42% 687 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 8553) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.2% Poor
Lighting 29.4
Reflection 36
Parallax 29.1
24% 31.5 fps
MRender 34.4
Gravity 29.8
Splatting 27.2
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 63 78 66 46 64 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 123
Write 99.4
Mixed 124
SusWrite 67.4
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 20.9
53% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 80.3
79% 130 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT451R7AFR8C-RD 6x4GB
6 of 8 slots used
24GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 37.9
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 27" 1280 720 SAM0D32 C27F390
Typical Precision T3610 Builds (Compare 2,382 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3610

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $373
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback