Asrock H81M-HG4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H81M-HG4  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140702
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 31 '23 at 13:35
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 200
75% 130 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 511
54% 429 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0412) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 6.3
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.7
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.26%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 227 221 235 240 233 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
78.4% Very good
Read 257
Write 242
Mixed 226
SusWrite 230
54% 239 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 64.9
4K Mixed 44.4
145% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 193
145% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
516GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 229 222 236 241 242 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
80.7% Excellent
Read 259
Write 244
Mixed 244
SusWrite 233
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 46.6
154% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 191
140% 183 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 137%
Kingston SA400S37240G 2TB
351GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 99 104 108 109 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 96.5
Write 81
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 103
56% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.57 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905471-079.A00LF 9905471-084.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 14.4
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 15.3
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 25" 1280 720 DELD070 DELL U2515H
Typical H81M-HG4 Builds (Compare 207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H81M-HG4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback