Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 211%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 196%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics242% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 23:43
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$105
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 76.4
1-Core 162
2-Core 305
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 852
87% 701 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$767
PNY(196E 13B2) ≥ 4GB; pny geforce rtx 4070ti
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
242% Outstanding
Lighting 349
Reflection 343
Parallax 394
284% 362 fps
MRender 490
Gravity 306
Splatting 220
263% 338 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 242%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-e100 512G 512GB
288GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 020fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 409 426 429 425 426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 469
Mixed 408
SusWrite 426
97% 428 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 38.6
147% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 154
132% 187 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 99%
Hs-ssd-e1000 512G 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: SN10515
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2136 2083 1955 615 606 608 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,582
Write 2210
Mixed 1,515
SusWrite 1,334
375% 1,660 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 79.5
273% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 727
DQ Write 817
DQ Mixed 833
610% 792 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 264%
Great: 259%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 29.5
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 31.7
SC Mixed 25.6
77% 27 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 0" 1280 720 SNY5F03 SAMSUNG
Typical A520M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 90 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A520M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $173
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback