Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190628
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 21:26
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 3000G-$52
AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.1% Average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 151
57% 99.8 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 245
31% 237 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
4.75% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 7.4
4% 6.57 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.2
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.75%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
As201 120GB 120GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V83C2C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 336 333 247 183 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 443
Write 339
Mixed 310
SusWrite 244
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 28.6
104% 37.9 MB/s
DQ Read 120
DQ Write 202
DQ Mixed 169
126% 164 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/4G KHX2666C16/8G 12GB
2666, 2666 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15.3
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 48 0 72.3" 1280 720 GSM0001 LG TV
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,713 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $407
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback