HP 870-200nn

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 9 months ago.
SystemHP 870-200nn  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 82F1
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 21:18
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 57.6
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 66.9
35% 53.1 Pts
4-Core 130
8-Core 368
28% 249 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.5% Good
Lighting 89.8
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 76.6
73% 56.7 fps
MRender 66.4
Gravity 79.7
Splatting 71.6
60% 72.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 344
Write 335
Mixed 260
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 13
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 17.7
56% 19.1 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 155
135% 199 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 124 145 111 193 194 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Read 151
Write 146
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 150
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 114%
ASMT 2105 1TB
169GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 131 97 166 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 148
Write 140
Mixed 86.3
SusWrite 129
168% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
130% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.7% Above average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 22.2
58% 20.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 11.3
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 59 60 20" 1280 720 HWP2695 HP L2045w
Typical 870-200nn Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

System: HP 870-200nn

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback