HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A54h
Memory	5.7 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070105
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 30 '23 at 11:11
Run Duration	183 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6400 5,556 User benchmarks, average bench 35% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	25.4% Poor	Memory 47.5 1-Core 23.7 2-Core 21.1 24% 30.8 Pts	4-Core 20.5 8-Core 31 3% 25.8 Pts	64-Core 34.8 2% 34.8 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Gigabyte(1458 375A) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 3.3 3% 3.93 fps	MRender 5.2 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 4.9 4% 4.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE300000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 42 52 52 58 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.9% Very poor	Read 139 Write 55.4 Mixed 41.2 SusWrite 48.3 16% 71 MB/s	4K Read 5.1 4K Write 9 4K Mixed 8.3 23% 7.47 MB/s	DQ Read 18.8 DQ Write 26.1 DQ Mixed 21 16% 22 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 16.9% Great: 53%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 124GB free Firmware: 3.AHL Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 78.9 Write 40.7 Mixed 47.3 42% 55.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 40%
Kingston UHSII uSD Reader 249GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 64GB free, PID 3307 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 17.4 Write 19.7 Mixed 20.6 25% 19.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 41GB 2,583 User benchmarks, average bench 17% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	10.9% Very poor	MC Read 3.1 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.4 GB/s	SC Read 3.3 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 170 24% 170 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.9% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	37	14	60	21.5"	1920 1080	AOC2275 2275W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc7700 Small Form Factor

CPU
Pentium D 2.80GHzIntelBench 29%, 3,782 samples	8x
Core2 6300Intel $40Bench 34%, 5,234 samples	5x
Core2 4300Intel $70Bench 33%, 2,455 samples	4x

GPU
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	3x

SSD
SSD2SC240G1SA754D117-459P 240GBPNYBench 80%, 154 samples	3x
LCT-128M3S 2.5 7mm 128GBLiteonitBench 67%, 256 samples	1x
Sata III 127GBIntensoBench 72%, 2,962 samples	1x

RAM
37GBUnknownBench 15%, 3,950 samples	9x
39GBUnknownBench 18%, 2,202 samples	7x
35GBUnknownBench 13%, 2,113 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16