Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics80.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110509
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 09:46
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 105
2-Core 174
74% 123 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 453
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 535.98
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.2% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 104
Parallax 95.8
82% 100 fps
MRender 90
Gravity 98.7
Splatting 95.4
78% 94.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X413
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 126 126 130 125 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 292
Write 212
Mixed 206
SusWrite 124
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 39.9
4K Mixed 29.9
96% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 91.5
DQ Mixed 95.2
72% 97.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 101%
Sandisk S3 1T00 1TB
534GB free
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 132 132 137 136 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 285
Write 206
Mixed 239
SusWrite 132
48% 216 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 23.8
78% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 105
DQ Write 91.6
DQ Mixed 90.5
70% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 118%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 3TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 162 161 163 162 161 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 144
Write 135
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 159
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 105%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
430GB free
Firmware: CC29
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 186 186 189 187 187 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 132
Write 105
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 186
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 114%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 1TB
205GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 57 56 56 56 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Read 73.4
Write 53.7
Mixed 33.8
SusWrite 55.7
40% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL8-4GBXM F3-12800CL9-4GBXL F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 16.5
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 16.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 120 27" 1920 1080 DEL4282 DELL G2723HN
Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback