Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is relative performance (0th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 100 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory5.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 30 '23 at 01:57
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Relative performance (0th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 0.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 4.3
2-Core 15.1
4% 9.7 Pts
4-Core 19.8
8-Core 29
3% 24.4 Pts
64-Core 47.8
3% 47.8 Pts
Poor: 60% Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.79
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.9% Below average
Lighting 25
Reflection 15.7
Parallax 55.3
20% 32 fps
MRender 44.5
Gravity 75.3
Splatting 82.7
57% 67.5 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0324A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 230
Write 208
Mixed 216
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 12.9
48% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 69.2
DQ Write 76.3
DQ Mixed 26.1
32% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 37% Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KH316C10F/8 1x8GB
1 of 8 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
11.7% Very poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 5
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 0.7
SC Mixed 0.4
2% 0.63 GB/s
Latency 651
6% 651 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 11.7%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0.7" 1280 720 LNKA001 LNKG H2VA001
Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback