Asus H81M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150526
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '23 at 19:33
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	KAZ-User
Background CPU	30%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79 11,598 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 68.6 1-Core 30.4 2-Core 55.8 36% 51.6 Pts	4-Core 73.8 8-Core 84.2 10% 79 Pts	64-Core 68.3 4% 68.3 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85C3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.67 Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 34.5 Reflection 37.9 Parallax 35.8 28% 36.1 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 35.1 Splatting 26.2 26% 32.9 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G2 120GB 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 70 70 71 69 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 390 Write 280 Mixed 276 SusWrite 85 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 15.7 63% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 155 DQ Mixed 32.7 54% 102 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 78%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 163 172 170 175 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	97.4% Outstanding	Read 173 Write 183 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 166 101% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.6 153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 97.4% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 8GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	MC Read 10.5 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 13.3 35% 12.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 11.7 27% 9.6 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	43	16	60	21.5"	1920 1080	HWP3057 HP P221

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-PLUS Builds (Compare 2,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-PLUS - $98

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	564x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	387x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	236x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	266x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	208x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	169x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	98x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	80x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	100x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	56x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	55x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16