Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	61.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220428
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '23 at 17:54
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 4100 1,048 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 78.6 1-Core 135 2-Core 256 86% 157 Pts	4-Core 470 8-Core 635 70% 552 Pts	64-Core 659 41% 659 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Lighting 31.4 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 40.7 26% 34.6 fps	MRender 41.1 Gravity 40.6 Splatting 33.7 31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HP S600 240GB 1,240 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN8108 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 169 194 186 182 160 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	61.4% Good	Read 313 Write 194 Mixed 205 SusWrite 175 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 25.6 106% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 84.7 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 124 98% 133 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 96%
Kingston SNA-DC/U 160GB 150 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 26GB free, PID 6298 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 30 30 28 29 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	16.3% Very poor	Read 54.5 Write 31.8 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 29.2 44% 35.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 16.3% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GB 46,352 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	40.3% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 12.3 MC Mixed 13.5 39% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 10.8 SC Mixed 13.3 37% 13 GB/s	Latency 83.1 48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	68	58	60	15.5"	1280 720	AOC1619 1619w

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 29%

Raft

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $69

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	1,470x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	1,308x
Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples	1,008x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	954x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	737x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	657x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	718x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	340x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	286x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	294x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	230x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	204x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $345

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16