HP Laptop 14-dq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 14-dq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C8
Memory5.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220309
Uptime7.5 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G4
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Memory 36.7
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 116
39% 71.2 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 286
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 272
17% 272 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G4
HP(103C 86C8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9664
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 4.7
Parallax 5.8
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 8.3
Splatting 9.3
7% 8.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN128HAHQ-000H1 128GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT24H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 157 159 161 160 160 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.9% Above average
Read 250
Write 237
Mixed 231
SusWrite 159
49% 219 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 20.5
65% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 281
220% 303 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 18.8
MC Mixed 14.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 218
18% 218 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 5% 37 37 24 0 13.9" 1280 720 AUO413D
Typical Laptop 14-dq1xxx Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-dq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback