Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-142

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago, 10 months ago, 9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-142 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PT10F
Memory	1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140422
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '23 at 15:17
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Memory 90.1 1-Core 47.8 2-Core 89.4 51% 75.8 Pts	4-Core 79.6 8-Core 107 12% 93.2 Pts	64-Core 122 8% 122 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FA30) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	1.6% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.8 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.07 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.6% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB 241 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0927A SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 199 137 100 77 83 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.3% Below average	Read 270 Write 139 Mixed 158 SusWrite 130 39% 174 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 26.8 4K Mixed 6.2 36% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 64.3 DQ Write 33.5 DQ Mixed 48.3 36% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GB 7,983 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 13.2 MC Mixed 11.2 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 6.6 22% 7.6 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	47	26	60	15.5"	1280 720	LEN40B0

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical SATELLITE C55-A-142 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba SATELLITE C55-A-142

CPU
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	4x
Core i3-2350MIntelBench 47%, 24,896 samples	2x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	4x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	2x

SSD
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	4x
128G 128GBSSDBench 57%, 241 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273EB0-YK0 M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GBSamsungBench 32%, 4 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	1x
M471B5173BH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,473 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $100

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359