Asus P8H61-I R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 58% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-I R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131128
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '23 at 13:28
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Memory 71.1 1-Core 89.5 2-Core 180 64% 114 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 304 39% 293 Pts	64-Core 308 19% 308 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.18% Terrible	Lighting 4 Reflection 4 Parallax 1.3 3% 3.1 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 4.1 Splatting 3.2 3% 3.77 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.18% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-180M6S-11 2.5 7mm 180GB 218 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: DCL110B SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 229 207 220 222 223 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.4% Good	Read 245 Write 226 Mixed 198 SusWrite 221 50% 222 MB/s	4K Read 24.7 4K Write 49.3 4K Mixed 28.9 101% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 166 DQ Mixed 125 108% 161 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 99%
GB0750EAMYB 750GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 166GB free Firmware: HPG2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 64 67 55 70 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	39% Below average	Read 69.5 Write 69.5 Mixed 63.7 SusWrite 65.8 50% 67.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.8 164% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB 443 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	41% Average	MC Read 15 MC Write 16.2 MC Mixed 15.1 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 9 SC Mixed 1.4 19% 6.77 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	57	60	24"	1920 1080	GSM58C5 E2442

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-I R2.0 Builds (Compare 203 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-I R2.0

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	41x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	19x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	17x

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	13x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	12x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	9x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 50%, 27,024 samples	14x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	12x
1866 CL10 Series 2x8GBUnknownBench 54%, 7,244 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $350

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16