Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics73.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210813
Uptime12.7 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 09:52
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$168
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
60% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 59.4
2-Core 110
51% 81.5 Pts
4-Core 238
8-Core 803
56% 521 Pts
64-Core 1,552
96% 1,552 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 60%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
73.1% Very good
Lighting 91.9
Reflection 96
Parallax 85.4
75% 91.1 fps
MRender 96.8
Gravity 87.2
Splatting 75.7
70% 86.6 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP500GM30023 500GB
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1782 702 708 665 628 767 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2416
Write 3,458
Mixed 2,490
SusWrite 875
521% 2,310 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 72.4
227% 76.4 MB/s
DQ Read 532
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 492
354% 460 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 241%
Great: 398%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
196GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 445 397 481 481 481 482 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 484
Mixed 398
SusWrite 461
104% 460 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 78.3
4K Mixed 50.5
166% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 372
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
MB8000GFECR 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: HPG3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 165 171 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 189
Write 180
Mixed 89.2
SusWrite 170
35% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.7
8% 3.8 MB/s
DQ Read 0.2
DQ Write 7.8
DQ Mixed 2.5
2% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
77.7% Very good
MC Read 35.6
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 29.4
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 26.8
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.9" 1280 720 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
Typical ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II Builds (Compare 2,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B550-F GAMING WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $648
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback