HP 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive186% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 8997
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 29 '23 at 09:07
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 57.5
1-Core 85.6
2-Core 153
56% 98.7 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 514
47% 396 Pts
64-Core 672
42% 672 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8997) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4091
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 20.1
Parallax 21.8
15% 20.2 fps
MRender 19
Gravity 25.6
Splatting 17
16% 20.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 710 1TB
648GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC2S038D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 964 1127 1038 1269 1257 710 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
186% Outstanding
Read 1,416
Write 1,066
Mixed 996
SusWrite 1,061
254% 1,134 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 39.3
127% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 595
DQ Write 518
DQ Mixed 487
384% 533 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 186%
Great: 305%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 19.7
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 12.8
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN1429
Typical 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback