TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics42.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive264% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K3405VC
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 23:42
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 73.8
1-Core 183
2-Core 374
108% 210 Pts
4-Core 744
8-Core 1,171
118% 958 Pts
64-Core 1,869
116% 1,869 Pts
Poor: 91% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPU
Asus(1043 3038) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3667
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.8% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 50.1
Parallax 53.7
46% 53.2 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 50.1
38% 45 fps
Poor: 26% ↑
This bench: 42.8%
 Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TB
874GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V5MA010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1781 1813 2083 2099 1516 1979 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
264% Outstanding
Read 1,158
Write 2160
Mixed 1,326
SusWrite 1,879
371% 1,631 MB/s
4K Read 52.7
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 64.5
232% 82.9 MB/s
DQ Read 932
DQ Write 504
DQ Mixed 744
546% 726 MB/s
Poor: 105% ↑
This bench: 264%
 Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
MC Read 37.5
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 31.3
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 23.3
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 92.9
43% 92.9 ns
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 89.8%
 Great: 93%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 0 40" 1280 720 SAM0B30 SAMSUNG
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VC Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K3405VC_K3405VC

CPU
Core i9-13900HIntelBench 107%, 5,250 samples14x
Core i5-13500HIntelBench 100%, 1,437 samples3x
GPU
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Laptop GPUNvidiaBench 40%, 204 samples11x
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 19%, 14,602 samples6x
SSD
Micron_2450_MTFDKBA1T0TFK 1TBNvmeBench 243%, 3,424 samples13x
SAMSUNG MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GBNvmeBench 242%, 600 samples2x
MZVL4512HBLU-00BTW 512GBSamsungBench 248%, 2,451 samples1x
RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GBMicronBench 73%, 1,021 samples13x
M471A1G44BB0-CWE M471A1K43EB1-CWE 16GBSamsungBench 70%, 1,158 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback