Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130726
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 16 '17 at 15:14
Run Duration	112 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 45.1 1-Core 117 2-Core 196 64% 119 Pts	4-Core 331 8-Core 606 56% 468 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290X-$549 37,353 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Asus(1043 0466) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.11.4 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	Lighting 64.9 Reflection 57.8 Parallax 82.2 53% 68.3 fps	MRender 58 Gravity 57.3 Splatting 73.9 53% 63.1 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 55%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275 8,527 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 1.5TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1523 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 715 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 61 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 66 (F1) Unknown 99 99 627383694	94.9% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 380 Mixed 419 96% 434 MB/s	4K Read 41.3 4K Write 74.7 4K Mixed 33 144% 49.6 MB/s	DQ Read 223 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 79.6 88% 149 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 135%
Samsung 840 Evo 1TB-$199 23,857 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5781 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2651 (B1) Unknown 98 98 20 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 45 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 5 (EB) Unknown 99 99 204 (F1) Unknown 99 99 42981459569	81.8% Excellent	Read 491 Write 321 Mixed 344 85% 385 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 52.4 4K Mixed 26.3 120% 39.1 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 58.3 68% 120 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 126%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 1866 C8 2x8GB 946 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	59% Above average	MC Read 24.5 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 21.8 68% 23.9 GB/s	SC Read 4.4 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 5.9 22% 7.67 GB/s	Latency 180 22% 180 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VI IMPACT Builds (Compare 205 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI IMPACT - $249

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	77x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	36x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	30x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	21x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	12x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
840 Evo 500GBSamsung $150Bench 103%, 68,337 samples	9x
840 Evo 1TBSamsung $199Bench 105%, 23,857 samples	7x

RAM
Vengeance Pro DDR3 1866 C9 2x8GBCorsairBench 55%, 18,444 samples	13x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	12x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $478

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16