HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI 2A9C
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100712
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 20:23
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 69.9
1-Core 75.1
2-Core 119
54% 88.1 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 171
21% 162 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 84DC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
2.98% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 1.3
3% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 3.3
3% 3.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.98%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
720GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 131 139 142 138 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Read 176
Write 173
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 136
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA <xternal HDD 250GB
233GB free, PID 0b0e
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 25 26 27 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.1% Very poor
Read 54.3
Write 27.5
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 26.3
41% 33.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
34% 0.63 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CE80CE80 M378B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
23.9% Poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.4
22% 7.87 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.67 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 23.9%
Great: 26%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 1R 1G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 9% 70 74 10 60 18.5" 1366 768 ACR01B3 G195HQV
Typical PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback