Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	49.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-Gaming 3
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF (all builds)
Memory	1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161122
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '23 at 16:52
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	77%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$77 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 98.9 1-Core 82 2-Core 114 64% 98.3 Pts	4-Core 246 8-Core 249 33% 247 Pts	64-Core 280 17% 280 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6500-XT-$140 2,413 User benchmarks, average bench 50% Sapphire(1DA2 E457) Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.1 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.3% Average	Lighting 60 Reflection 66.8 Parallax 118 49% 81.6 fps	MRender 104 Gravity 64.8 Splatting 29.9 50% 66.1 fps
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 27 62 26 52 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 355 Write 264 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 51.6 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 8.8 4K Mixed 0.9 6% 3.33 MB/s	DQ Read 78.8 DQ Write 10.8 DQ Mixed 12.2 17% 33.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 95%
Seagate Expansion Desk 500GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 0GB free, PID 3320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 28 27 27 27 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 152 Write 21 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 27.3 55% 56.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GB 30,824 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.8% Poor	MC Read 10.1 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 7.1 23% 8.03 GB/s	SC Read 8 SC Write 6.8 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.3 GB/s	Latency 41.5 96% 41.5 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	37	9	200	27"	1280 720	HKM2700 E27FHD-G

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF Builds (Compare 361 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-Gaming3-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $91Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	67x
Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples	46x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	39x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	72x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	32x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	28x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	23x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	10x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	10x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 2x4GBUnknownBench 75%, 7,488 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $246

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16