Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131129
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Jul 28 '23 at 13:05
Run Duration	124 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	44%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770-$75 176,321 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	74.9% Very good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 98.5 2-Core 189 74% 125 Pts	4-Core 328 8-Core 470 50% 399 Pts	64-Core 540 33% 540 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.9% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$294 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 8734) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	88.7% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 125 Parallax 107 90% 114 fps	MRender 132 Gravity 96.2 Splatting 91.8 86% 107 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 173 165 162 159 157 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 499 Write 411 Mixed 257 SusWrite 173 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 36.9 142% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 274 DQ Mixed 232 199% 295 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 377GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 129 130 128 127 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 132 Write 120 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 128 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown SLB304G08-GGNHM 0215 CMV8GX3M1A1600C11 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 21.1 MC Mixed 16.8 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 20.6 SC Mixed 19.6 54% 18.7 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 33: 0P 4R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
33%	48%	23	489	415	60	27"	1920 1080	AUS2768 ASUS PA279

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	415x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	397x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	351x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	164x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	156x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	45x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	38x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	218x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	216x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	114x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $334

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16