HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory192GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 192GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProLiant ML350p Gen8  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory181 GB free of 192 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 13:02
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2
Proc 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 51.9
2-Core 122
48% 79.9 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 349
37% 294 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 0
Reflection 61.1
Parallax 88.4
0% 49.8 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 74.1
Splatting 46
49% 61.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.6%
Great: 56%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 500GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 103 101 102 101 102 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 40% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
UNKNOWN NOT AVAILABLE 6x31.8GB
6 of 24 slots used
191GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 7.2
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 56 60 23" 1280 720 HWP2912 HP x23LED
Typical ProLiant ML350p Gen8 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProLiant ML350p Gen8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 233% - Outstanding Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback