Medion E62029

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 118%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMedion E62029  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200519
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJul 28 '23 at 11:46
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Memory 89.4
1-Core 117
2-Core 243
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 740
75% 610 Pts
64-Core 902
56% 902 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Zotac(19DA 1630) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 185
Reflection 175
Parallax 166
151% 176 fps
MRender 190
Gravity 138
Splatting 117
118% 148 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
E12-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27-BB1 512GB
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1270 528 469 571 425 568 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1304
Write 2,284
Mixed 1,408
SusWrite 639
319% 1,409 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 66.3
212% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 565
DQ Write 645
DQ Mixed 698
500% 636 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 185%
Great: 219%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
931GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 473 473 473 473 477 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 472
Mixed 439
SusWrite 472
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 43.7
153% 53.5 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 155
119% 165 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 104%
Great: 128%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
133GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 61 61 61 62 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 61
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 61.1
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 23.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 24
73% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 32: 0P 5R 2G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
32% 24% 34 552 456 60 27.6" 1536 864 SAM701E LC27T55
History: Score 8: 0P 1R 1G 0B | Score 32: 0P 5R 2G 1B
Typical E62029 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E62029

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback