Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400T 4,070 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	59.2% Above average	Memory 73.2 1-Core 78.8 2-Core 155 60% 102 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 270 35% 266 Pts	64-Core 262 16% 262 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake) 153,031 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 36CC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8476 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	4.54% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 4.7 Parallax 6.1 5% 5.47 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 5 Splatting 9.3 4% 4.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.54% Great: 7%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD10EZEX-08WN4A0 240GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z33130RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 50 68 75 72 65 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive	Read 51.7 Write 250 Mixed 288 SusWrite 75 38% 166 MB/s	4K Read 13.7 4K Write 9.8 4K Mixed 13 43% 12.2 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 32.2 DQ Mixed 23.3 37% 74.1 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 96%
Wilk USB DISK 3.0 64GB 180 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 55GB free, PID 6300 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 26.7 Write 26 Mixed 12.7 27% 21.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 28% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 27%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C14S4/4G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB 72 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.1% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 12.6 34% 11.8 GB/s	Latency 94.2 42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 42.1% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	52	60	21.5"	1280 720	LEN1201 LEN-510I-C

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16