Toshiba Satellite C55-C

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	4.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	73.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite C55-C (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150415
Uptime	74.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 27 '23 at 16:01
Run Duration	118 Seconds
Run User	LBN-User
Background CPU	38%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5500U 73,655 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 86.4 1-Core 79.2 2-Core 141 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 188 8-Core 201 26% 194 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz) FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Toshiba(1179 F840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	4.38% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 8.4 Parallax 6.9 4% 6.77 fps	MRender 5.9 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 7.2 5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.38% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB 7,138 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 164GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 234 135 144 80 91 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	73.9% Very good	Read 430 Write 396 Mixed 331 SusWrite 159 74% 329 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 50.7 4K Mixed 33.9 115% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 172 152% 227 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 6GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	41.1% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 12.3 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.6 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 9 31% 10.9 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	66	53	60	15.5"	1280 720	LGD0456

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite C55-C Builds (Compare 477 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite C55-C

CPU
Core i5-5200UIntelBench 42%, 107,407 samples	188x
Core i3-4005UIntelBench 39%, 37,483 samples	83x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	50x

GPU
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	265x
HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 275,372 samples	85x
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	39x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $100Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	14x

RAM
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 23%, 714 samples	74x
TSB16D3LS1MNG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 50%, 976 samples	46x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 48%, 30,873 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 32% - Below average

Total price: $38

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359