Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemDell XPS 8700  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0KWVT8
Memory21.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 12:10
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$65
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 87.6
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 184
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 304
8-Core 493
49% 399 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Nvidia(10DE 098A) 1.5GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 21
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 30.8
17% 25.7 fps
MRender 33.2
Gravity 28.7
Splatting 25.8
24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SBBU240G1122 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 77 51 70 70 47 MB/s
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.7% Below average
Read 236
Write 97.2
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 67.5
23% 105 MB/s
4K Read 13.3
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 15
76% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 17.9
DQ Mixed 28.5
33% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 66%
Smart XceedValue2 mSATA 32GB
7GB free
Firmware: 3D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 47 44 41 37 40 MB/s
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 278
Write 88
Mixed 124
SusWrite 44.4
29% 134 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 15
58% 20.4 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 33.2
DQ Mixed 55.5
56% 95.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 45%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
432GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 102 103 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 78.4
Write 120
Mixed 90
SusWrite 101
72% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 66%
Seagate Basic 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9340
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 105 110 105 107 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
49.9% Average
Read 68.1
Write 111
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 106
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.9%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 130 135 135 134 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
71.8% Very good
Read 117
Write 123
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 133
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-066.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23" 1280 720 DEL40F4 DELL P2317H
Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $271
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback