Colorful DJ C.H310M-E D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful DJ C.H310M-E D3  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful DJ C.H310M-E D3
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 08:34
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 58.4
2-Core 148
56% 94.7 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 241
30% 231 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
Asus(1043 0535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 52.9
Parallax 56.8
30% 48.6 fps
MRender 57.6
Gravity 43.9
Splatting 41.6
38% 47.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 247 248 254 249 256 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 384
Write 272
Mixed 173
SusWrite 246
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 28.1
103% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 296
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 120
118% 191 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 89%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
58GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 22 58 55 22 18 MB/s
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.6% Average
Read 204
Write 269
Mixed 197
SusWrite 63.3
41% 183 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 13.7
76% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 83.2
99% 167 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Ramsta-1600MHz-8G Kingston HP698650-154-KEB 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.8
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 7.5
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 22" 1680 1050 HWP26FC HP L2245w
Typical DJ C.H310M-E D3 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Colorful DJ C.H310M-E D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback