Colorful DJ C.H310M-E D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful DJ C.H310M-E D3  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful DJ C.H310M-E D3
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181116
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 27 '23 at 08:10
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G5400-$55
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 96.2
2-Core 161
68% 114 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 215
30% 222 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 470-$126
Asus(1043 0535) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.1% Below average
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 56.6
Parallax 58.4
30% 50.8 fps
MRender 55.9
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 41.6
38% 47.7 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X231706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 149 157 166 155 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 370
Write 192
Mixed 156
SusWrite 160
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 46.3
4K Mixed 25.3
88% 30.7 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 117
118% 194 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 89%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$32
73GB free
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 123 14 12 5.1 7.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 243
Write 307
Mixed 243
SusWrite 80.1
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 12.9
73% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 81.9
98% 167 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 86%
Seagate FreeAgent Go 500GB
311GB free, PID 2100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 34 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 51
Write 35.3
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 35.1
47% 36.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
43% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston HP698650-154-KEB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.9
MC Mixed 15.8
46% 16.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 14.5
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 211 58 60 22" 1680 1050 HWP26FC HP L2245w
Typical DJ C.H310M-E D3 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Colorful DJ C.H310M-E D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $306
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback