Lenovo 10AXA2APJP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 12%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.17% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10AXA2APJP  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SHARKBAY
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150317
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 16:32
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4130-$41
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Memory 7.57
1-Core 69.5
2-Core 104
30% 60.5 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 206
25% 193 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 309E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 1
Parallax 3.7
2% 2.47 fps
MRender 0.5
Gravity 2
Splatting 4.4
2% 2.3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 240 279 308 185 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
60% Above average
Read 302
Write 256
Mixed 256
SusWrite 237
59% 263 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 19.4
86% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 47.2
71% 130 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 60%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
8.75% Terrible
MC Read 2.5
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 2.8
9% 3.23 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.7
SC Mixed 1.6
5% 1.6 GB/s
Latency 427
9% 427 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 2% 63 10 3 60 23.8" 1920 1080 DELA09C DELL P2414H
Typical 10AXA2APJP Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10AXA2APJP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $41
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback