Oegstone MS-7817

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemOegstone MS-7817  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H81M-P33 (MS-7817)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140126
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 26 '23 at 13:38
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 57%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.7% Good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 174
69% 117 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 365
42% 326 Pts
64-Core 422
26% 422 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.5% Average
Lighting 59.4
Reflection 60
Parallax 56.1
48% 58.5 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 55.5
49% 60.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 217 229 233 230 231 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.6% Average
Read 222
Write 198
Mixed 186
SusWrite 220
46% 206 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 6.8
40% 13.8 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 159
124% 170 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 184 181 187 184 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Write 29
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 184
57% 78.3 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
115% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 17.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 15.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 120 35" 1280 720 BNQ7F46 BenQ XR3501
Typical MS-7817 Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Oegstone MS-7817

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $114
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback