Asus U31SD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus U31SD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK U31SD
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110706
Uptime11 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 21:08
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2330M-$150
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
47.3% Average
Memory 81.5
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 87.7
49% 73.6 Pts
4-Core 74.3
8-Core 115
12% 94.7 Pts
64-Core 53.1
3% 53.1 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M
Asus(1043 16F2) 1GB
CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
1.71% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 0.3
2% 1.33 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.71%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC100S37128GD 128GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 74 8.1 25 8.7 36 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 405
Write 303
Mixed 210
SusWrite 50.5
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 40
4K Mixed 15.6
68% 24.3 MB/s
DQ Read 139
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 67.5
82% 140 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.3% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 11.4
SC Mixed 12.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 40" 1280 720 SAM0B30 SAMSUNG
Typical U31SD Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus U31SD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $188
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback