Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.24% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140327
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 18:03
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 50%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5800K APU (2012 D.Tr)-$119
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 66.3
39% 58.4 Pts
4-Core 89.9
8-Core 126
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7660D
AMD(1002 9901) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
5.24% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.5
Parallax 7.1
5% 7.4 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 7.1
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.24%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 14 20 23 49 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Read 24.4
Write 32.1
Mixed 21
SusWrite 33.2
20% 27.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.5
161% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend JM1600KLN-4G JM1333KLN-4G 8GB
1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.6% Poor
MC Read 12.5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 10.3
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 4.9
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 52 27 60 20" 1280 720 SAM08A8 S20B300
Typical GA-F2A55M-HD2 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A55M-HD2 - $110

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback