Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 45% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.82% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE L850-12H (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131001
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 25 '23 at 16:42
Run Duration	119 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	58%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2350M 24,896 User benchmarks, average bench 47% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	Memory 70 1-Core 54.3 2-Core 91.6 46% 72 Pts	4-Core 57.3 8-Core 73.9 8% 65.6 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 56%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M 7,895 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 FB31) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	3.82% Terrible	Lighting 5 Reflection 4.6 Parallax 0.9 4% 3.5 fps	MRender 4 Gravity 4.2 Splatting 4 3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.82% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03150002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 261 99 56 50 56 59 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	48.6% Average	Read 287 Write 199 Mixed 177 SusWrite 96.7 42% 190 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 31.2 4K Mixed 24.4 79% 25.4 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 123 99% 139 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 M471B5173EB0-YK0 8GB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	38.1% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 13.6 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 6.3 SC Mixed 6.9 20% 7.03 GB/s	Latency 101 39% 101 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	30	9	60	15.5"	1366 768	LGD033A

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16