Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 106%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 15:21
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.6% Excellent
Memory 77.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 247
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 482
8-Core 902
83% 692 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
MSI(1462 3982) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 134
Parallax 286
111% 185 fps
MRender 253
Gravity 146
Splatting 200
162% 199 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 123%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNVS1000G 1TB
442GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK5N09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 225 202 229 232 264 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1074
Write 1,516
Mixed 1,119
SusWrite 372
230% 1,020 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 60.5
204% 72.7 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 762
528% 654 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 156%
Great: 246%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$88
159GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 0.3 0 0.2 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 89.9
Write 91.3
Mixed 50
SusWrite 0.4
43% 57.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 85%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
204GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 95 98 96 96 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 78.9
Write 98.9
Mixed 60.3
SusWrite 94.7
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
58% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB
122GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 159 159 157 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 135
Write 148
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 157
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 88%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$88
594GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 87 86 85 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 97.9
Write 100
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 86.2
64% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4161CAB2F1HB2 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
MC Read 37
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 30.6
97% 34 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 29.1
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 23" 1280 720 GSM6424 M2550A
Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 7,379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback