| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
| System | Fujitsu CELSIUS H7510 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | FUJITSU FJNBB6E |
| Memory | 47.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20210604 |
| Uptime | 2.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 25 '23 at 14:37 |
| Run Duration | 140 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon W-10885M
Onboard, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
|
74.3%
Very good
|
73% 126 Pts
|
56% 458 Pts
|
56% 901 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel UHD Graphics P630
Device(1E26 0036) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
|
3.57%
Terrible
|
5% 8.27 fps
|
0% 0.73 fps
| |
|
Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000
Device(1E26 005B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.59
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.6%
Average
|
51% 53.4 fps
|
46% 59.1 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M474A4G43AB1-CVF 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
69.2%
Good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
54% 19 GB/s
|
55% 73.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 62 | 42 | 60 | 15.5" | 1920 1009 | BOE0853 |
Typical CELSIUS H7510 Builds (Compare 55 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Fujitsu CELSIUS H7510
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-10850HIntelBench 79%, 6,246 samples | 24x |
| Core i9-10885HIntelBench 81%, 6,135 samples | 19x |
| Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples | 8x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples | 27x |
| Quadro T1000NvidiaBench 37%, 3,238 samples | 13x |
| Quadro RTX 3000NvidiaBench 67%, 3,632 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |