HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87B0
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime25.9 Days
Run DateJul 25 '23 at 03:59
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 59.5
1-Core 53.1
2-Core 94.3
42% 69 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 329
30% 255 Pts
64-Core 397
25% 397 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)
HP(103C 87B0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.50.02.11
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 35.5
Parallax 8.5
5% 16.8 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 15.2
Splatting 8.5
9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 322 328 334 332 291 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 779
Write 799
Mixed 730
SusWrite 339
149% 662 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 39.5
4K Mixed 30.5
101% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 512
DQ Write 377
DQ Mixed 433
327% 441 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 103%
Great: 183%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.3% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 21.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 15.5" 1536 864 CMN1526
Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec1xxx Builds (Compare 2,466 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 15-ec1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback