Wortmann_ag TERRA_MOBILE_1512/1712

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_MOBILE_1512/1712  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo W2xxCZQ
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 23:05
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 58%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1037U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
42.6% Average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 45.7
2-Core 62.3
42% 60.7 Pts
4-Core 68.1
8-Core 69.2
9% 68.6 Pts
64-Core 68.5
4% 68.5 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Clevo(1558 2400) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHZ2320BH G2 320GB
265GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 00000009
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 43 38 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 54.9
Write 53.1
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 48.2
35% 47.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S4G64CC88C4N-DI Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 12.1
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.1
26% 9.17 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 30 60 17.3" 1280 720 LGD0357
Typical TERRA_MOBILE_1512/1712 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_MOBILE_1512/1712

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback