Firebat T5 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemFirebat T5 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardFirebat T5 Series
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 种颜色,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 24 '23 at 11:59
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 72.5
1-Core 162
2-Core 326
98% 187 Pts
4-Core 638
8-Core 1,022
102% 830 Pts
64-Core 1,230
76% 1,230 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Clevo(1558 5E00) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.02
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 82.9
Parallax 33.4
20% 46.9 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 26.8
Splatting 22.3
17% 20.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Firebat FET34-512G 512GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0323A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1332 1101 533 188 230 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,711
Write 1,534
Mixed 1,093
SusWrite 590
275% 1,232 MB/s
4K Read 52
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 26.7
199% 80.1 MB/s
DQ Read 942
DQ Write 1,009
DQ Mixed 566
539% 839 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 204%
Great: 260%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MTA4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
62% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 25.2
MC Mixed 18.9
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 62%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 15.5" 2048 1152 BOE0A07
Typical T5 Series Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Firebat T5 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback