Gigabyte GA-B760I AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 333%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 406%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics288% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760I AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory24.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 21:03
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$292
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 221
2-Core 435
125% 244 Pts
4-Core 880
8-Core 1,680
152% 1,280 Pts
64-Core 3,111
192% 3,111 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 120%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Asus(1043 8900) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
288% Outstanding
Lighting 432
Reflection 408
Parallax 466
352% 435 fps
MRender 531
Gravity 361
Splatting 259
300% 384 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 288%
Great: 305%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB (2019)-$300
876GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102430WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1918 1852 1327 1328 1131 996 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 1,904
Write 2,362
Mixed 1,766
SusWrite 1,426
421% 1,865 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 70.4
292% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1785
DQ Write 1,691
DQ Mixed 1,805
1,336% 1,760 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 329%
Great: 320%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX 5600 C36 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
155% Outstanding
MC Read 61.1
MC Write 61.8
MC Mixed 57.2
172% 60 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 51.2
SC Mixed 29.7
98% 34.2 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 127%
This bench: 155%
Great: 187%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 144 27" 1280 720 GSM5B7F 27GL850
Typical GA-B760I AORUS PRO Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 226%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 246%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760I AORUS PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $931
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback