User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 113%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics135% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-QD4
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 18:46
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73.9% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 172
68% 116 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 670
60% 507 Pts
64-Core 1,590
98% 1,590 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Asus(1043 88B0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
135% Outstanding
Lighting 188
Reflection 175
Parallax 162
153% 175 fps
MRender 226
Gravity 136
Splatting 119
126% 160 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 135%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2107 1908 1832 1834 1857 1854 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,265
Write 2,183
Mixed 2,115
SusWrite 1,898
477% 2,115 MB/s
4K Read 51.3
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 62.8
200% 64.5 MB/s
DQ Read 623
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 549
391% 506 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 291%
Great: 488%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
931GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2130 2141 1960 2045 2102 1939 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,272
Write 2,178
Mixed 2,113
SusWrite 2,053
486% 2,154 MB/s
4K Read 51.4
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 62.5
200% 64.3 MB/s
DQ Read 621
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 551
392% 507 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 300%
Great: 488%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G40EB2-CTD 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
122% Outstanding
MC Read 59.1
MC Write 43.2
MC Mixed 44.8
140% 49 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 18.6
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 122%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 ACR06AB SB220Q
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback