Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X515JA
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200819
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '23 at 09:07
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	12%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1035G1 53,170 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	50.9% Above average	Memory 58.4 1-Core 85 2-Core 154 56% 99.3 Pts	4-Core 235 8-Core 368 37% 301 Pts	64-Core 419 26% 419 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 50.9% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 14F2) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.04% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 7.3 4% 6.47 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 9.6 8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.04% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
ENGFASAAHTH2BT240GB 240GB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0210 SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 61 82 45 72 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Read 378 Write 243 Mixed 212 SusWrite 87.7 51% 230 MB/s	4K Read 13.6 4K Write 23.3 4K Mixed 5.1 40% 14 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 10.7 DQ Mixed 14 33% 75.4 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 68%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB 179,769 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 730GB free Firmware: JU0C2J SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 132 132 132 135 133 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	75.4% Very good	Read 128 Write 138 Mixed 55.9 SusWrite 133 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 6.1 4K Mixed 0.6 234% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GB 2,191 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 3200, 3200 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	60% Good	MC Read 25.9 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 20.5 63% 22.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 21.1 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 132 30% 132 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 70%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 4: 0P 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
4%	13%	15	56	28	60	15.5"	1536 793	CMN15F5

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA Builds (Compare 707 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JA_X515JA

CPU
Core i3-1005G1IntelBench 44%, 22,960 samples	377x
Core i5-1035G1IntelBench 51%, 53,170 samples	286x
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	43x

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	663x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	43x
GeForce RTX 3090 TiNvidiaBench 7%, 1 sample	1x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	142x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	84x
MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 7,359 samples	83x

RAM
4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBMicronBench 71%, 1,143 samples	124x
M471A5244CB0-CWE Hynix HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 8GBSamsungBench 57%, 2,191 samples	112x
M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 34%, 6,590 samples	89x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16