Lenovo 3209N6M

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

10 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	Lenovo 3209N6M (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 23 '23 at 06:49
Run Duration	146 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 79.9 1-Core 88.5 2-Core 168 66% 112 Pts	4-Core 285 8-Core 300 39% 292 Pts	64-Core 307 19% 307 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 03DA) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.69% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.5 Parallax 2 2% 2.2 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 2 Splatting 2 2% 2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.69% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2TB free Firmware: M3CR043 SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 418 421 422 438 433 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 357 Write 450 Mixed 350 SusWrite 425 90% 396 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 67.3 4K Mixed 43.8 142% 48.2 MB/s	DQ Read 391 DQ Write 351 DQ Mixed 159 177% 301 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 125%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 447GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC65 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 121 133 133 130 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	73.6% Very good	Read 130 Write 132 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 126 83% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 88%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 109GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.3 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 15.4 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 80.7 50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	23.5"	1280 720	AOC2470 2470W

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 3209N6M Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3209N6M

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	10x
Core i3-2120Intel $75Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	2x
Core i7-2600Intel $124Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	2x

GPU
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	3x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	2x

SSD
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	2x
SSDNow UV400 240GBKingston $89Bench 71%, 105,079 samples	1x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G6M1 8GBHynixBench 52%, 76 samples	3x
KP223C-ELD 99P5471-001.A01LF 4GBKingstonBench 37%, 3 samples	2x
HMT41GU6DFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 2,722 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $59

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16