Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime2 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 03:39
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 197
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 363
46% 351 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 6.9
6% 6 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.8
7% 7.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
309GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 338 350 332 332 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 396
Write 342
Mixed 254
SusWrite 331
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 25.5
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 31.6
120% 44.6 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 136
153% 260 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 129%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB
400GB free, PID 0704
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 39 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 50.9
Write 31.5
Mixed 27.5
SusWrite 38.7
48% 37.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
51% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 20%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 500GB
462GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 93 93 87 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 85.3
Write 88
Mixed 51.6
SusWrite 91.5
107% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 50 60 31.5" 1920 1080 GSM76F5 32inch LG FHD
Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $691
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback