Aierben NA17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive300% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemIntel NA17
MotherboardAierben NA17  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJul 23 '23 at 01:58
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 67.1
1-Core 178
2-Core 337
101% 194 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 969
99% 798 Pts
64-Core 1,478
92% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 92%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Intel(8086 2112) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4338
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.2
Reflection 27
Parallax 27.6
19% 25.9 fps
MRender 24.7
Gravity 34.1
Splatting 18.6
20% 25.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fanxiang S500PRO 512GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2020 1802 1767 816 664 651 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Read 2,253
Write 2,309
Mixed 1,736
SusWrite 1,287
426% 1,896 MB/s
4K Read 68.1
4K Write 191
4K Mixed 81
308% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 920
DQ Write 726
DQ Mixed 848
628% 831 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 300%
Great: 302%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 33.2
MC Mixed 34.3
101% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 37.7
SC Mixed 23.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 24 3 60 23.8" 1280 720 PHL0929 PHL 241B8Q
Typical NA17 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Aierben NA17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback